Search Results for "NSE Regulations"

69 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Pledge Dispute Over Shares. Court Restrains Transfer of Pledged Shares and Orders Deposit of Surplus Sale Proceeds Pending Suit.

The Plaintiff, Pushpanjali Tip Up Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Mrs. Renudevi Choudhary and others concerning shares pledged as security for loans. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Non-Consideration of Counter Claim in NSEIL Dispute. Failure to consider counter claim amounts to legal misconduct and violation of natural justice under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rajendra A. Shah (H.U.F.), a constituent, challenged an arbitral award dated 17th February 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Counterclaim in Share Brokerage Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that appellant failed to prove respondent's negligence in squaring off F&O contracts without notice.

The appellant, Avalon Investment Private Limited, was a client of the respondent, Mukesh Brokerage & Financial Limited, a share broker registered with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Derivative Transaction Case. Exchange Traded Derivatives Held Not Speculative Under Section 43(5) of Income Tax Act, 1961, with Retrospective Application of Clause (d) of Proviso.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-IV against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in favor of th...