Search Results for "Modi Medical Jurisprudence"

129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Hired Car Driver Stabbing Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that the last seen theory, recovery of weapon, and motive established the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Sandipkumar Sureshbhai Patel, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Mazharkhan Saidkhan Pathan, a driver of an Innova c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC in Dowry Murder Case; Questions Sustainability of Conviction When Co-Accused Were Acquitted. Appeal Seeks Re-appreciation of Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Opinion on Strangulation; No Final Verdict in Provided Text.

In this criminal appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, the appellant, accused No.1, challenged his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Instigation or Harassment. Death by Burning Held to be Accidental, Not Suicidal, Based on Medical and Circumstantial Evidence.

The appellant, Dhavalkumar Arun Dombe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara for offences under Sections 498-A and 306 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Prosecutrix Testimony. Acquittal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 376, 504, 506, 109 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 6th August 2001 passed by the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent. Alleged Rape of Minor Maid by Employer Fails as Prosecutrix's Testimony Lacks Credibility and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Forcible Intercourse Under Section 376 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Prashant Baburao Gawand (respondent/accused) by the IInd Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Raigad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Vijay Tulshiram Bangar (accused no.1) and Anil Sahadeo Wankhede (accused no.2) against their convictio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Contradictory Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Onkar Timaji Shende, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 302, 201 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Suresh Shankarrao More, was convicted by the trial court for the offences of rape, murder, causing disappearance of evidence, and commi...