Search Results for "Mardia Chemicals"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Mardia Chemicals"

66 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC — Suit for Specific Performance Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Refusal to Execute Sale Deed in 2018.

4 Sep 2025

The appellants, Sri K.T. Govinde Gowda and Smt. G. Anuradha, filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challe...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

26 Oct 2018

The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Dispute Under Maharashtra Trust Act. Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC Alleges Bar of Suit by Sections 22, 50, 51, 70 of Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950.

10 Jul 2019

The dispute centered on the expulsion of two trustees from a trust registered under the Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950. The applicants, comprising ten in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Matter — No Interference with Possession Notice as Debtor Failed to Discharge Liability. Court Held That Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Used to Circumvent Statutory Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

3 Feb 2025

The petitioners, Sri S.V. Ramaswamy, Mrs. Usha Ramaswamy, and R.K. Associates (a partnership firm), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Con...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Non-Compliance with Section 18(1) Second Proviso — Debt Recovery Tribunal Failed to Consider Borrower's Application Before Issuing Recovery Certificate. The court held that the DRT must decide an application for waiver or reduction of the pre-deposit under Section 18(1) second proviso of the SARFAESI Act before entertaining the appeal or issuing a recovery certificate.

8 Oct 2013

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actions of secured creditors under the S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case, Restoring Interim Order for Sale of Mortgaged Property. The Court held that the interim order directing steps for sale without final orders was warranted to protect the secured creditor's rights under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as the respondent had defaulted on credit facilities.

18 Apr 2023

The appeal arose from a dispute between Punjab & Sind Bank (appellant) and M/s Frontline Corporation Ltd. (respondent) concerning the sale of mortgage...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit Challenging SARFAESI Action — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit Alleging Violation of RBI Guidelines and Fraud.

14 Nov 2019

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Bank of Baroda (applicant/original defendant) challenging an order dated 26/04/2018 passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Pre-deposit Condition for Appeal Under Section 406(2)(e) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 — Condition Not Arbitrary or Unreasonable. The provision requiring deposit of disputed tax as precondition for appeal is valid and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

16 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 406(2)(e) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corpo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Pre-deposit Condition Under SARFAESI Act — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 18 Provisos. The court held that the legislature may condition the right of appeal and the provisions are not discriminatory compared to the RDB Act.

1 Jul 2011

The petitioners, National Polymers and others, challenged an order dated 6 April 2011 of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal directing them to depos...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)