Search Results for "Mamlatdar's Court"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Mamlatdar's Court"

436 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 436 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Mamlatdar's Orders in Land Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice Principles. Failure to Provide Hearing Opportunity to Stakeholders Under Section 5 of Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 Renders Proceedings Void as Authorities Acted Mechanically Without Judicial Application of Mind.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from proceedings under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 concerning certain agricultural lands. The petitioners, wh...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Revision Due to Gross Delay. Inordinate Delay of 34 Years in Challenging Mamlatdar's Order Cannot Be Condoned Without Proper Explanation Under Tenancy Act.

10 Feb 2026

The State of Gujarat, through the Deputy Collector, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mundkar Determination Orders Due to Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Petitioner's challenge to Mamlatdar's order of 02.08.2001, Deputy Collector's order of 28.06.2002, and Administrative Tribunal's order of 04.07.2012 dismissed as time-barred and on merits.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Jose Antonio Damaciano Laticia Dias Mendes, filed a writ petition challenging three orders: (a) the Mamlatdar of Salcete's order dated...

High Court

High Court Quashes Orders Under Mamlatdar's Courts Act for Non-Compliance with Procedure — Plain Application Treated as Suit Without Following Sections 7 to 11. The court held that a plain application cannot be considered a plaint under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar's Courts Act without following the procedure under Sections 7 to 11, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

12 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Nandkumar Damkondwar, challenged the orders of the Tahasildar and Sub-Divisional Officer, Hadgaon, which had directed him to provide a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Tenancy Dispute — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred Under Agricultural Tenancy Act as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action for Easementary Rights and Possessory Remedies.

22 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Comunidade of Calapur, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the CPC challenging the order dated 07/09/2017 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Right of Way Dispute — Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Findings Set Aside. The appellate court erred in reversing the trial court's findings merely by forming a second opinion and by relying on an alternate way that was not comparable to the claimed right of way under the Mamlatdar Courts Act, 1906.

20 Mar 2017

The dispute pertains to a right of way claimed by the defendants (appellants) over the plaintiffs' (respondents') land bearing Gat Nos. 12 and 13. The...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Mundkar Declaration — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interferable Under Article 226. The court upheld the declaration of respondents as Mundkars under the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of the Deputy Collector and Administrative Tribunal.

7 Jul 2014

The petitioners, legal heirs of Krishna Vithoba Xete Tilve, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Bomba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Delay in Section 6 Declaration. Section 6 Declaration Issued Beyond One Year from Last Publication of Section 4 Notification Invalidates Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioners, Riva Resorts Pvt. Ltd. and its director Vishwanath Balaram Naik Palyekar, challenged the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal in Eviction Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of License and Unauthorized Occupation. The Court held that the appellants failed to prove Mundkar status and that the suit was not barred by the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975.

6 Mar 2013

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellants (defendants in the original suit) against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Declaration of Tenancy Attains Finality and Cannot Be Ignored by Civil Court. The Additional District Court erred in ignoring the tenancy declaration in Tenancy Case No.9/94 which had become final and binding on the parties.

23 Sep 2005

The case involves a second appeal by the plaintiff, Vishnum Shankar Naik, against the judgment of the Additional District Court in a suit for declarat...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)