Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

526 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 526 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU and PULP Act Held Not Maintainable for Lack of Jurisdictional Error.

2 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Rohit Dembiwal, filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Labour Court Award in Favor of Workman in MSRTC Dismissal Case — 25% Back Wages Granted for Procedural Violation. Dismissal Quashed as Enquiry Officer Was Not Appointed by Competent Authority Under Section 6(6) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Aug 2019

The petitioner, the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and award dated 4.8.2018 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Forest Department in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Regularisation of Daily Wager Upheld. Industrial Court's finding of unfair labour practice under MRTU and PULP Act for non-regularisation of a daily wager with 240 days of continuous service was confirmed by the Single Judge and the Division Bench.

4 Oct 2018

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Chief Conservator of Forests, Pune and another against the judgment and order dated 15th Decemb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Rejection of Workman's Complaint Seeking Cancellation of Recognition of Union. Individual Employee Cannot Initiate Proceedings Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act.

3 May 2018

The dispute arose out of a complaint filed by an individual workman, Bharat Jijaba Shinde, purportedly on behalf of 309 out of 400 employees of Force ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Against Employer for Unfair Labour Practice in Denying Government Resolution Benefits to Non-Teaching Staff. Employer's Failure to Implement Government Resolution Dated 13-5-1999 Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 5 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

5 Oct 2015

The petitioner, J.K. Education Society, an educational institution, challenged the judgment and order of the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No.61...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Company's Petition and Dismisses Workmen's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 6 Upheld, but Direction for Permanent Status Set Aside for Workmen Not Proving 240 Days Service Under Item 9.

22 Feb 2011

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order of the Industrial Court, Pune, in Complaint (ULP) Nos.169 of 1993 and 493 of 1993. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ICAR and NRCC, Upholds State Government as Appropriate Government for Labour Dispute. Jurisdiction of Labour Court under MRTU & PULP Act Confirmed for Termination of Agricultural Labourers Employed by Central Government Undertaking.

23 Nov 2010

The case involves an appeal by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the National Research Centre for Citrus (NRCC) against a judgmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Daily Wage Employee Terminated for Absence Without Inquiry — Employer Failed to Prove Abandonment or Conduct Domestic Inquiry Under MRTU & PULP Act. Termination of a daily wage employee for 15 days' unauthorized absence without holding a domestic inquiry was held to be an unfair labour practice under Item 1 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, and the employee was entitled to reinstatement with full back wages.

28 Sep 2010

The Administrator of Kalyan Municipal Corporation challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which found the termination of Respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Finding That Employee Is a Workman Under MRTU & PULP Act. Termination Without Enquiry Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

6 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Morarjee Gokuldas Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd., challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which dismissed its revision applicat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeals in Industrial Dispute Cases — Workmen Entitled to Reinstatement with Back Wages as Retrenchment Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Was Illegal. The court upheld the Labour Court's finding that retrenchment of workmen who had completed 240 days of service was void for non-compliance with Section 25-F, and reinstatement with full back wages was justified.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Godrej Industries Ltd. (formerly Godrej Soaps Ltd.), employed the respondents as workmen. The respondents were retrenched by the appell...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)