Search Results for "Lok Adalat Award"

107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Writ Petition Challenging Section 28-A Award as Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy. Acquiring Body Cannot Seek Reference Under Section 28-A(3) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as It Is Not a 'Person Interested' and Is Barred by Section 50(2).

The Bombay High Court dealt with three writ petitions filed by the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Limited, the acquiring body for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Megha Lok Adalat Decree in Property Suit — Petitioner Not a Party to Compromise. Decree Passed Without Jurisdiction as Dispute Was Not Referable to Lok Adalat Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

The petitioner, Kishore Baldev Bajaj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a decree dated 25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Suit — Remand Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Order XLI Rule 33 CPC. Appellate Court Exceeded Powers by Setting Aside Final Decree in Unconnected Suit Without Appeal or Cross-Objection.

The appellant, Smt. Shantawwa, filed a Miscellaneous Second Appeal under Section 43 Rule 1(u) read with Section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Divorce by Mutual Consent Case — Restores Trial Court's Decree Under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. First Appellate Court Erred in Setting Aside Mutual Consent Divorce After Full Payment of Settlement Amount and Withdrawal of Consent by Wife.

The appellant-husband and respondent-wife were married on 01/02/1998 as per Hindu rites. Disputes arose, leading to the wife filing a suit for restitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Order Allowing Construction After Lok Adalat Award Demolition. Lok Adalat Award Does Not Bar Subsequent Permitted Construction Under Kerala Panchayath Building Rules, 2011.

The appellant, Dr. Cheriyath Jyothi, a resident of Karakulam Gram Panchayath, filed a complaint before the Panchayat Secretary on 6 May 2013 alleging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Award in Execution Proceedings. Lok Adalat Award Under Section 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Is Final and Binding and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 47 CPC.

The petitioner, Dhanraj Dnyaneshwar Koche, along with respondent No.2, owned an agricultural field and entered into an agreement to sell it to respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Compromise Decree in Lok Adalat Settlement — Minor's Interest Not Protected. Failure to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem for Minor Defendant Renders Compromise Decree Voidable Under Order 32 Rule 7 CPC.

The Letters Patent Appeal was filed by Mangesh, a minor, through his next friend Ambika Manik Mane, challenging the decision of a learned Single Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Compromise Decree in Lok Adalat Settlement — Minor's Interest Not Protected. Court sets aside compromise decree as minor defendant was not properly represented and compromise was not in his interest under Order 32 Rule 7 CPC.

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from the decision of a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 2965/2011, which had upheld a compromise dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds MACT Award in Motor Accident Claim Despite Insurance Company's Breach of Policy Conditions Defense. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation to Third Party Victims with Right to Recover from Owner Under Section 149 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 5th May 2003, when a Dumper knocked down Farida Shabbir, who was proceeding on her scooter, res...