Search Results for "Liberal Construction"

514 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 514 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Customs Department's Reference Application in Export Valuation Case. Tribunal's finding that facts were indistinguishable from precedent upheld, no question of law arises.

The Principal Commissioner of Customs filed a Civil Petition under Section 130A of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the final order of the Central E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging APMC Market Fee Exemption for Farmers. Exemption notification under Section 63 of Karnataka APMC Act, 1966 held valid and not violative of Article 14.

The petitioners, who are traders and commission agents in the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) yard at Tiptur, filed a Public Interest Lit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Filing Revisions Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act — Delay of 4 Years Not Sufficiently Explained. The court upheld the lower court's discretion in rejecting condonation applications for lack of sufficient cause.

The Bombay High Court at Goa disposed of three writ petitions (WP Nos. 278, 279, and 280 of 2015) by a common order, challenging three separate orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Extension of Toll Collection Period in BOT Road Project. Court holds that concession period extension is a contractual matter and not subject to judicial review under Article 226 in absence of arbitrariness or public interest violation.

The petitioners, claiming to be public-spirited citizens, filed a writ petition in public interest challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtr...