Search Results for "Invalid cheques"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Invalid cheques"

86 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Amalgamated Company Must File Return for Pre-Amalgamation Period. Section 153A Notice Validly Issued to Transferor Company Despite Amalgamation, and Failure to File Return Attracts Penalty Under Section 276CC.

1 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against the order of the Delhi High Court, which had ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Comply with Rule 3(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence Against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. The court held that the requirement of specifying the date of meeting in the notice is mandatory, and non-compliance renders the motion void.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. A notice of no-confidence motion was given by 14 members of the Gram Panchayat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

8 May 2014

The petitioner, Debashu Services Private Limited, a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, is a regular assessee under the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Appeal Against No-Confidence Motion, Upholds Validity of Meeting Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. The court held that the notice period for a no-confidence motion is to be computed from the date of receipt of notice by the Collector, and that the motion can be validly passed even if the Sarpanch is absent from the meeting.

22 Jan 2013

The appellant, Balaji Ganpati Manmode, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kharola. A no-confidence motion was moved against him by respondent no.5, Su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Roaming Agreement — No Prima Facie Case for Security or Attachment Established. Court held that mere breach of contract does not entitle a party to interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, unless there is a serious dispute and balance of convenience in favor of the applicant.

28 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Vodafone Spacetel Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim measures again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

22 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Employee Without Proper Domestic Inquiry — Violation of Natural Justice and Service Rules. The court held that dismissal without a proper domestic inquiry is invalid and directed reinstatement with back wages.

29 Nov 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by Mrs. Vatsala Premchand Sarmal, the petitioner, challenging the dismissal of the First Respondent, Mr. Raghu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice for Non-Observance of Rule 81 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 and Section 25G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Custom and Practice of Negotiation with Union Constitutes Condition of Service. The court held that the established custom of negotiation with the union was a condition of service, and its breach, along with non-compliance with the 'last come first go' principle, constituted unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act.

5 May 2006

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Mackinon Mackenzie Ltd. (the appellant/original respondent in the complaint) against the judgment o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution and Consideration of Representation. Delay of Over Five Months in Executing Detention Order and Three Months in Considering Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

2 Feb 2005

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohd. Kunhi Kallattra, challenged a detention order dated 28.2.2002 issued by the Secretary (Preventive Detenti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery Proceedings Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act — Failure to Provide Loan Documents and Proper Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Recovery Certificate Quashed and Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration with Opportunity of Hearing.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, a partnership firm and its partners, filed a writ petition challenging the recovery proceedings initiated by respondent No.3, the Vai...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)