Search Results for "Guardian"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Guardian"

1502 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1502 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions in Succession Dispute Over Will Execution — Court Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Application for DNA Test of Will Executant. The Court Held That When Execution of a Will is Disputed on Grounds of Forgery or Fraud, DNA Profiling of the Testator May Be Ordered to Ascertain Genuineness Under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

24 Apr 2026

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Mrs. Shruti Sood alias Shruti Banerji, the widow of Late Amit Banerji, against her mother-in-law Mrs. Sa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Father's Custody of Minor Child in Habeas Corpus Petition, Emphasizing Natural Guardian's Right and Child's Welfare. The court held that the father, as natural guardian, is entitled to custody unless it is against the child's welfare, and directed transitional custody to minimize disruption to the child's education.

7 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the father, Vivek Kumar Chaturvedi, against the State of U.P. and others, challenging a High Court order that d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Hindu Succession Case, Reinstating Inheritance Rights of Grandsons. Release Deed Executed by Father During Grandfather's Lifetime Held Void as It Involved Non-Transferable Spes Successionis Under Section 6(a) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Does Not Bar Succession Under Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

25 Jan 2023

The dispute centered on succession to the separate property of Sengalani Chettiar, who died in 1988. He had two marriages: from the first, a son Chand...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guardianship Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Family Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Guardianship of Person. Property Claims Cannot Be Adjudicated Independently in Guardianship Proceedings.

1 Apr 2021

The petitioner, the father of two minors, filed a guardianship petition under Sections 6 and 11 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Ex Parte Appointment of Guardian Under Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 — Natural Father Not Heard Before Removal. Family Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Guardianship Matters Under Family Courts Act, 1984, and Mere Murder Charge Without Conviction Does Not Disqualify Father Under Mohammedan Law.

2 Aug 2019

The appellant, Mohd. Azeemoddin, challenged the order dated 02.09.2016 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge-3, Aurangabad, in M.A.R.J.I. No.160/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Father Seeking Custody of Minor Daughter from Maternal Relatives. Court holds that welfare of the child is paramount and father's petition is not maintainable as child is not in illegal detention.

6 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari, filed a writ of habeas corpus before the Bombay High Court seeking production and custody of his minor ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Family Court Order Disturbing Child Custody Based on Consent Without Welfare Inquiry. The court held that a custody order under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 cannot be passed solely on consent without considering the welfare of the child.

8 Dec 2016

The case involves an appeal by the father (Appellant 'A') against a Family Court order dated 15 July 2014 that disturbed the custody of his two minor ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires formation of opinion based on relevant material and cannot be passed mechanically or without application of mind.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires a subjective satisfaction based on relevant material, and mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings or adverse entries without a review committee recommendation cannot sustain the order.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)