Search Results for "Group D"

Trending :

Search Results for "Group D"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Displaced Person in Railway Employment Case — Entire House Demolition Qualifies Under Policy Circular. Court holds that demolition of entire residential house constitutes 'house taken away' under Railway Board Circular dated 19.04.2006, entitling displaced person to consideration for Group D employment.

22 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from the rejection of the appellant's claim for employment under the Railway Board's policy for displaced persons. The appellant's fa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes CVC Order Divesting CBI Director of Powers — Rule of Law and Institutional Independence Upheld. The court held that the CVC exceeded its powers under Section 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the CVC Act, 2003 read with Section 4(1) of the DSPE Act, 1946, and that the orders were invalid as they undermined the independence of the CBI Director.

8 Jan 2019

The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging the legality of three orders dated 23rd October 2018. The first order was passed by the Centra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Regularization of Casual Workers. Regularization of Seniors Upheld but Direction for Absorption in Other Establishments Set Aside.

8 Jan 2019

The Union of India appealed against a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which upheld a direction of the Central Administrative Tribunal to regulari...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes CVC Order Divesting CBI Director of Powers — Rule of Law and Institutional Independence Upheld. The court held that the CVC exceeded its powers under Section 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the CVC Act, 2003 read with Section 4(1) of the DSPE Act, 1946, and that the divestment of the CBI Director's functions without due process violated the rule of law.

8 Jan 2019

The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging the legality of three orders dated 23 October 2018. The first order was passed by the Central ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against U.P. Jal Nigam in Workmen Reinstatement Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court Held That the Order Dated 07.09.2015 Only Required Giving Preference to Retrenched Workmen for Future Vacancies, Not Automatic Reinstatement.

4 Jan 2019

The present contempt petitions arose from an order dated 07.09.2015 passed by the Supreme Court disposing of a batch of Special Leave Petitions filed ...

3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)