Search Results for "Government Company"

6893 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6893 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in Power Supply Dispute Due to Bona Fide Dispute. Debt under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 not recoverable via winding up when substantial defense exists.

The petitioner, Vedanta Limited, filed a company petition seeking winding up of the respondent, Global Energy Private Limited, under Section 433(e) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Consent Order in Company Oppression Case — Parties Bound by Consensus. Consent order for share buyout under Sections 397-398 of Companies Act, 1956 cannot be challenged by consenting party.

The case involves an appeal filed by Shalby Limited and others against an order dated 25.04.2016 passed by the Company Law Board (CLB), New Delhi Benc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Application Under Section 434 Companies Act Seeking Transfer of Winding-Up Petition to NCLT. Applicant Argues No Irreversible Steps Taken, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.

The matter arose from a Company Petition filed in 2010 seeking winding up of Broadcast Infratel India Private Limited on grounds of unpaid admitted de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Company Law Board Order — Transfer of Shares After BIFR Recommendation Void Under Section 536(2) Companies Act, 1956. Winding Up Deemed to Commence from Date of BIFR Recommendation Under Section 441(2) Companies Act, 1956.

The appellants, Maharashtra Antibiotics and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (MAPL) and Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd., challenged an order of the Company Law Board (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in 50:50 Joint Venture Due to Availability of Buy-Out Remedy. Loss of mutual trust and confidence does not automatically justify winding up under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 when one party is willing to purchase the other's shares.

The petitioner, Severn Trent Water Purification Inc, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 against Capital Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Admission of Winding Up Petition in Shareholder Deadlock Case. The core issue concerns whether a petitioner who is not the registered shareholder can maintain a winding up petition after the registered shareholder merged into it.

The dispute concerned the winding up of Capital Controls India Private Limited, a joint venture between Chloro Controls (India) Private Limited and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal on Distribution of Company Assets in Liquidation. Holds that Secured Creditors Have Pari Passu Charge Only Over Properties Specifically Charged, Not All Assets; Workmen Have Priority for Uncharged Properties Under Sections 529 and 529A Companies Act, 1956.

The dispute arose from the winding up of U.M.I. Special Steel Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The company became sick, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeals Against Company Law Board's Investigation Order Under Section 237(b)(i) of Companies Act, 1956. Appeals challenge the order directing investigation into the affairs of companies allegedly linked to Ketan Parekh in the 2001 stock scam.

The judgment pertains to 14 appeals filed by various companies alleged to be controlled by Ketan Parekh, the central figure in the 2001 stock market s...