Search Results for "General Provident Fund Rules"

300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds RBI Circular Denying Arrears of Pension from Date of Retirement in Pension Option Case. Prospective Pension from July 1, 2020, Upheld as Valid Exercise of Employer's Discretion.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) appealed against a Division Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court that had dismissed its appeal against a Single Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Damages Against Employer in EPF Act Case for Default in Contributions. Levy of Damages Under Section 14B is Consequential Upon Default Without Requirement of Mens Rea for Breach of Civil Obligations.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka, which upheld an order for recovery of damages under Section 14B of the Employees Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Pension Dispute with Institute Employees — State Not Liable for Pension Payments Under Institute's Self-Funded Scheme. Board Resolution Explicitly Stated No Separate Grant Would Be Sought from Government for Retirement Benefits.

The present appeal arises from a dispute between the State of Bihar and employees of the Anugraha Narayan Sinha Institute of Social Studies, Patna, re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits by Counting Prior Service with Board Under Rule 46(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Resignation to Take Up Another Appointment with Permission Does Not Forfeit Past Service

The Petitioner, Smt. Nagaveni R., filed a writ petition seeking pension and other retiral benefits by counting her service from 25.2.1975 to 5.11.1984...