Search Results for "Forfeiture clause"

479 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 479 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SAFEMA Notice Against Family Members of Convicted NDPS Offender. Property Attachment Under SAFEMA Sections 68A-68I Upheld as Independent of Criminal Trial Outcome.

The petitioners, Zaibunissa Ebrahim Khan, Junaid Ebrahim Khan, Faizal Ebrahim Khan, Imran Ebrahim Khan, and Afzal Ebrahim Khan, are family members of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award in Date of Birth Fraud Case. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Not Applicable as Misconduct Did Not Involve Moral Turpitude or Loss to Employer.

The petitioner, Western Coal Fields Limited, a government company, challenged the concurrent orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Upholding Forfeiture of Security Deposit and Detention of Equipment in Contract Dispute. Termination of Contract for Poor Performance and Failure to Transport Export Container Held Justified Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a dispute between M/s Vijay Trading and Transport Company (appellant) and Central Warehousing Corporation (respondent) concernin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against SAFEMA Forfeiture Based on Invalid Detention Order — Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Quashed as Representation Not Considered Before Revocation, Forfeiture Set Aside

The case involves a challenge to the forfeiture of properties under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Dispute — Holds That Dismissal for Disorderly Behaviour Under Model Standing Orders 22(a) and 22(l) Constitutes 'Disorderly Conduct' Under Section 4(6)(b)(i) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Disentitling Employee to Gratuity.

The petitioner, Jaya Hind Industries Ltd., employed the respondent, Vilas Vithalrao Takale, as a Clerk. Two charge sheets were issued to the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Bank Guarantees in Tender Dispute. Earnest Money Deposit Forfeited as Bidder's Unilateral Discount Offer After Bid Opening Violated Tender Terms.

The petitioner, Knowledge Infrastructure Systems Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in coal trading, along with its shareholder, filed a writ petition under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...