Search Results for "FIR contradictions"

691 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 691 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Double Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shamji @ Sunil @ Dakudo S/o Kalubhai Mer, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jetpur at Rajkot, for the murders of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Contradictions in Prosecution Version. Conviction Under Sections 148, 302/149 and 324/149 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Set Aside as Dying Declaration Was Unreliable and Witness Testimony Contradictory.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal challenging the conviction and life imprisonment sentence imposed on the appellants for murder under Sections 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Based Solely on Prosecutrix's Testimony Unsustainable Where Medical and FSL Reports Do Not Support Prosecution Case.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar against the State of Bihar, setting aside his conviction under Sections 376(1) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Murder Case Based on Ocular Evidence. Related Witnesses' Testimony Found Credible Despite Minor Discrepancies with Medical Evidence.

The case arises from a murder that occurred on 17 June 1982. The deceased, Sarman Singh, had a prior altercation with accused Lakhan Singh over a land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Material Contradictions in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC set aside as FIR version differed substantially from trial evidence.

The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 3, were convicted by the IInd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, on 31.5.2002 for offences under Sec...