Search Results for "Ex-parte Order"

480 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 480 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Execution Order in Eviction Suit — Mundkar Claim Rejected, Adverse Possession Not Proven. The executing court erred in dismissing execution on the ground of adverse possession when the decree was valid and the issue was already decided.

The petitioners, Miss Aura Serafina Crispina de Souza and Miss Agnes Felicia de Souza, are the original decree-holders who obtained an eviction decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Against Restoration of Possession in Execution Proceedings — Compromise Decree Set Aside Without Notice to Decree Holder Violates Natural Justice. Order XXI Rule 99 CPC Application Cannot Be Decided Without Hearing the Decree Holder.

The petitioner, Smt. Leelavathi, filed a civil revision petition under Section 18 of the Karnataka Small Causes Courts Act, 1964, challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution of Ex-Parte Decree in Money Suit — Procedural Compliance Under Order 21 Rule 11[A] CPC Upheld. Execution Petition Filed with Proper Affidavit of Assets and Within Limitation, No Ground to Dismiss EP.

The case involves a Civil Revision Petition filed by A.S. Jahangir (petitioner) challenging the order dated 30.01.2026 in EA No.3/2025 in EP No.688/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Non-Service of Summons for Judgment on Defendants' Advocate. Service on Defendants directly without prior attempt on advocate held insufficient under Order XXXVII CPC.

The petitioners, original defendants in Summary Suit No.4914 of 2012, challenged the order dated 08.07.2013 passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Custody Order Due to Lack of Proper Service and Remands Matter for Fresh Hearing. Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 — Sections 6, 7 — Custody of minor child — Ex parte order passed without ensuring effective service on respondent mother.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 28.5.2013 passed by the Judge, Family Court No. 7, Bandra, Mumbai, in Petition No. D-75 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Quashing of FIR Set Aside — Supreme Court Reiterates Limits of Section 482 CrPC in Property Fraud Cases.

The Supreme Court set aside the Madras High Court’s order quashing criminal proceedings arising from alleged fraudulent settlement deeds in a fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Family Court Ex-Parte Order and DV Act Complaint as Frivolous. Family Court's Direction to Proceed Ex-Parte Upheld and DV Act Complaint Cannot Be Quashed as It Is Not a Criminal Proceeding Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Natarajan Sundaresan, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging orders passed in family court and magistrate p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ex-Parte Award Passed Against Deceased Proprietor Due to Improper Service on Wrong Legal Heir. Service of Notice on Non-Existent Person Invalidates Ex-Parte Proceedings and Award.

The petitioner, Ashish Arunkumar Kejriwal, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Industrial Court that rejected his application to set asi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Divorce Appeal Due to Alleged Fraud and Suppression of Ex-Parte Decree by Husband. The court found sufficient cause for delay of 5 years 144 days as the wife was unaware of the ex-parte divorce decree obtained allegedly by fraud and suppression.

The appellant, Mrs. Regi Suresh Nair, filed a Civil Application for condonation of delay of 5 years and 144 days in filing an appeal against an ex-par...