Search Results for "Electricity Theft"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Electricity Theft"

112 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case — Failure to Prove Theft Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Accused Acquitted Under Section 135(1) of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 as Prosecution Failed to Establish Illegal Connection and Theft of Electricity.

18 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 07.0...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case — Failure to Prove Theft Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal upheld as prosecution failed to establish illegal connection and theft of electricity under Section 135(1) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

18 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 07.07...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Electricity Theft Case — Defendant Not Liable for Unauthorized Use by Third Party Without Proof of Involvement. Theft of Electricity by Direct Hooking from LT Line Does Not Automatically Impute Liability to the Consumer in Absence of Evidence Connecting Him to the Theft.

13 Jan 2026

The appellant, original defendant, was a consumer of electricity supplied by the respondent, Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. On 06.02.2002, an electr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Procedural Violation Found as No Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Was Given Before Provisional Assessment. The court held that the requirement of 'reasonable opportunity of being heard' under Section 126(1) is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with, quashing the assessment order and directing fresh proceedings.

22 Feb 2024

The petitioners, City Center Mall Private Limited and Shrirang Sarda, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 136 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove theft beyond reasonable doubt.

3 Mar 2020

The appellant, Kenchanna, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Spl. C. No.285/2008 for an offence punishable under Section 136...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 155 of Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that prosecution under Section 135 cannot proceed without a complaint by an authorized officer as mandated by Section 155.

12 Jul 2019

The applicant, Sou. Vimal w/o. Murlidharrao Suradkar, filed a criminal application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Enhanced Demand in Electricity Theft Case — Appellate Authority Cannot Enhance Contract Demand Without Cross-Objection. Maximum demand for electricity charges cannot be increased by appellate authority in absence of cross-objection by the board under the Electricity Act, 2003.

26 Mar 2018

The petitioner, M/s Ravi Steel Industries, a partnership firm, challenged two appellate orders passed by the Appellate Authority (respondent No.2) und...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal in Electricity Theft Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft and Non-Compliance with Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003. Theft of Electricity Not Proved as Accused Was Not a Regular Consumer and No Meter Was Installed, But Prosecution Failed to Establish Direct Theft.

3 Mar 2011

The appellant, Yuvaraj Pundalik Gadhave, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 17 of 2005 for theft of elec...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Direct Theft and Procedural Lapses. Theft of Electricity Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove That the Accused Was Directly Involved in the Theft or That the Meter Was Tampered With.

3 Mar 2011

The appellant, Bhanudas Supadu Wani, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 11 of 2005 for theft of electric...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Challenging Conviction Under Electricity Act for Theft of Energy — Held That Theft of Electricity is a Continuing Offence and Limitation Under Section 468 CrPC Does Not Apply.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a batch of criminal revision applications filed by Kailaskumar Bhawarlal Jain challenging his conviction under Section 39 of ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)