Search Results for "Dishonour of cheque"

155 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 155 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Dishonour of Cheque Due to Insufficient Funds. Court Held That Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act Stands Unless Rebutted by Accused on Preponderance of Probabilities.

The case involves a criminal appeal against conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of a cheque issued by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Compensation Order in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Mere Failure to Prove Case Not Sufficient for Compensation Under Section 250 CrPC. The court held that without a finding of false or vexatious complaint, compensation cannot be imposed under Section 250 CrPC.

The appellant, Prashant Jawarkar, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Dr. Ganesh Vasu,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Compromise Cheque Dishonour Constitutes Separate Offence. Settlement of earlier cheques does not discharge liability under a fresh cheque issued as part of the compromise.

The appellant, Prabhakar Gaidhane, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Nivruti Kamdi, by the Judicial Magistrate, First C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Conviction in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Dishonour of Cheque Due to Account Closed. Cheque issued for time-barred debt not legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioners, Sidharth Narayan Siddhapur and M/s Taurus Earthmovers Limited, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Conviction in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant's Partner. Failure to Prove Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Complainant Firm Not Properly Represented.

The petitioners, Sidharth Narayan Siddhapur and M/s Taurus Earthmovers Limited, were the accused in a complaint filed by M/s Fluidmac, a partnership f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Demand Notice as Required by Section 138(b) of the Act.

The petitioner, M/s Soft-touch Computer through its proprietor Shashikant Bhaskar Zope, filed three criminal writ petitions under Section 482 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Decree in Summary Suit Based on Dishonoured Cheque — Insufficient Funds Endorsement Establishes Liability Under Negotiable Instruments Act. Directors of Company Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Cheque Amount with Interest.

The respondent, M/s S.P. Fabritech, filed a summary suit (Regular Civil Suit No.58 of 2011) against the appellants, M/s Aarti InfraProjects Pvt. Ltd. ...