Search Results for "Departmental proceedings barred"

236 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 236 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petition by Employee Against National Insurance Co. for Removal from Service Due to Unauthorized Absence. Medical Grounds and Alleged Procedural Lapses Raised Under National Insurance (CDA) Rules, 2014.

The petitioner, a senior assistant in the National Insurance Company, challenged her removal from service following a departmental inquiry for unautho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Workman's Right to Advocate in Domestic Enquiry. Management Representative with HR Background and Enquiry Experience Deemed Legally Trained Mind, Justifying Workman's Right to Legal Representation Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a challenge by the employer, The Indian Express (P) Ltd and its officers, against an order of the Industrial Court at Thane dated 9 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sealed Cover Procedure in Promotion — No Vested Right to Promotion Exists. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to promotion as sealed cover procedure was validly applied due to pending vigilance inquiry.

The Petitioner, Pramod Kumar, an employee of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. in Scale IV, appeared for a departmental promotional examination for Scale V ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Protection Force Dismissal Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Disciplinary Authority's Disagreement with Inquiry Officer Without Hearing Employee Invalidates Dismissal Under Railway Protection Force Act, 1957.

The respondent, Amar Bahadur Singh, was appointed as a 'Rakshak' in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) of the Central Railway in 1960. On 15 April 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Compulsory Retirement Order Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner's challenge to a 1986 compulsory retirement order dismissed as the dispute was settled by compromise and the writ petition filed in 2014 was grossly delayed.

The petitioner, S. Rudrappa, a retired cashier of The Mysore Merchants Co-op. Society Ltd., was compulsorily retired on 16.09.1986. He challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Condonation of Delay by Karnataka Housing Board under Limitation Act. High Court's Order Condoning 3966-Day Delay in Filing Second Appeal is Scrutinized on Grounds of State Lethargy and Sufficient Cause.

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka condoning a delay of 3966 days in filing a second appeal by t...