Search Results for "Defence quota"

88 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Uttar Pradesh Reservation in Promotion Rules Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of Constitution. Conflicting High Court Decisions on Requirement of Quantifiable Data for Backwardness and Inadequacy of Representation Lead to Appeals.

The case originated from a batch of civil appeals preferred by the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging conflicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Ex-Serviceman's Petition Against MSRTC for Denial of Appointment Under Dependents' Quota. Voluntary Retirement from CRPF Held to Be Retirement, Entitling Petitioner to Consideration Under Government Resolutions of 1980 and 2012.

The Petitioner, Altaf Badshah Mujawar, voluntarily retired from the Central Reserved Police Force (CRPF) on 25th August 2001 while serving as a Soldie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Higher Pay Scale to Chargemen in Ordnance Factories. Classification of Chargemen as 'Workman' under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not entitle them to pay scale of supervisors under the Time Scale Scheme.

The petitioners, employees of Ordnance Factories under the Ministry of Defence, filed writ petitions challenging the denial of higher pay scale under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Direct Recruitment of Regional Officers in Maharashtra Pollution Control Board. Service Regulations Permitted 50% Direct Recruitment and Advertisement for Three Posts Was Valid as Per Quota.

The petitioners, employees of the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board, challenged an advertisement dated 06.06.2002 issued by the Board for filling th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to LPG Distributor Selection Guidelines and Advertisement. Guidelines Providing for Objective Criteria Including Land Ownership and Financial Capacity Upheld as Valid.

The petitioners, Suresh Pralhad Pawar and Balasaheb Mahadeo Kshirsagar, filed writ petitions challenging the advertisement dated 27th July 2011 issued...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Stays Amendment to Rule 5A of PGET Rules, 2006 Pending Final Disposal — In-Service Medical Officers Challenge Mid-Selection Change in Weightage Methodology. Interim Stay of Notification Operative Pending Final Disposal.

The petitioners, six in-service medical officers working as General Duty Medical Officers in Karnataka, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Bond Obligation for Super-Speciality Doctors in Public Medical Colleges — Service Condition and Penalty Valid Under Article 226. Doctors Who Completed D.M./M.Ch. Courses Must Serve Two Years or Pay Rs.25 Lakhs Penalty as Per Government Resolution Dated 8 February 2008.

The petitioners, comprising 62 doctors in the first petition and 69 in the second, were doctors who had either completed or were pursuing super-specia...