Search Results for "DRAT"

102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against DRAT Order Rejecting One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case. RBI Circular of 2003 Held Not Applicable to Accounts That Became NPA Before 31st March 2000.

The petitioners, Kanwar Vilas Raj Nath and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Guarantors and Corporate Debtor Directed to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioners, Kishan Chhelaram Manik and Manik Engineering Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Applicants Revision Applications Against Multiple Borrowers in Loan Recovery Case Due to Procedural Deficiencies and Lack of Jurisdictional Error

The High Court dismissed a series of Civil Revision Applications filed by Applicant challenging the dismissal of its applications for restoration of s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bank Officers in SARFAESI Act Loan Recovery Dispute. Civil Nature of Transaction Precludes Criminal Prosecution Under Sections 406, 409, 420 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by K. Virupaksha and another, who were Deputy General Managers of Canara Bank, against the order of the Kar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Bank Entitled to Recover Debt Under RDB Act. DRT Has Inherent Power to Reject Frivolous Counterclaim Without Recording Evidence, and High Court Should Not Interfere When Alternative Remedy of Appeal Exists.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Fin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes DRAT Order Waiving Pre-deposit in SARFAESI Appeal — Mandatory Deposit Under Section 18(1) Cannot Be Waived Without Recording Exceptional Hardship. Cooperative Bank's Right to Enforce Security Interest Upheld as Secured Creditor Under SARFAESI Act.

The petitioner, Godavari Laxmi Co-operative Bank Ltd., a cooperative bank, had issued a notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...