Search Results for "Corruption allegations"

1034 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1034 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Prabhakar Uddarwar, who was a Nazul Surveyor in the office of Taluka Inspec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Misapplication of Section 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Charge Framed Under Wrong Provision Invalidates Conviction

The appellant, a Junior Clerk in a Sessions Court, was convicted under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for allegedly demanding and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Convictions Under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act: Convictions Under Sections 161 and 120B IPC Set Aside, Conviction Under Section 5(1)(d) Prevention of Corruption Act Sustained as Money Demanded Only to Avoid Harassment and Not as Official Favour

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Dalpat Singh, a Havaldar, and another, a Subedar in the Rajasthan Armed Constabulary, against their conviction by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Kolhapur, for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 5,000 from Bipin Yeshwant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Complainant's Testimony Lacks Corroboration and Material Witnesses Not Examined Under Section 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sayaji Dashrath Kawade, was serving as Sub-Divisional Engineer in the Department of Telecommunications at Aurangabad. The complainant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Doctor in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dr. Smt. Usha Dhondiram Sarwade, a Casualty Medical Officer at Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, was convicted by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010300082015_1

The appeal arose from the conviction of two public servants employed in the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) for demanding and accept...