Search Results for "Confidential Statements"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Confidential Statements"

138 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 138 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction — Bootlegger's Preventive Detention Set Aside. The court held that the detaining authority failed to apply its mind to the material and form a genuine subjective satisfaction that the petitioner's activities were prejudicial to public order under the MPDA Act.

24 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Ibbu Kashim @ Kasim Nuriwale, a bootlegger, challenged his preventive detention order dated 30/06/2025 passed by the District Magistra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Termination of Procurement Agreement. Pre-Arbitral Negotiation Clause Held Not Mandatory Condition Precedent Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Apr 2019

This is an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Tech Mahindra Ltd. against Tata Communications Transfor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Communal, Anti social and other Dangerous Activities Act, 1980 — Non-Application of Mind to Vital Documents. Detaining Authority's Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Witness Statements Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3 of the Act.

3 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Gopal Bhujangrao Kadam, was detained under a preventive detention order passed by the District Magistrate, Akola on 13.4.2018 under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Challenge to RTI Disclosure Order — Building Plans Held Exempt as Personal Information Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act. Third Party Proprietary Plans Not Subject to Disclosure Absent Larger Public Interest.

30 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Ferani Hotels Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, challenged an order of the State Information Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Government Servant's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order on Promotion Claims. Petitioner's claim for promotion from 1979 rejected due to delay and laches as he approached Tribunal in 1991 after retirement in 1988.

5 Aug 2013

The petitioner, Gopalrao Ambadasrao Borikar, a retired Deputy Collector, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Non-Compliance with Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 — Failure to Supply In-Camera Statements and Inadequate Notice Period Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

25 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Santosh Raghunath Patil, challenged an externment order dated 20th September 2010 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone 2,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Delay in Disposal of Representation. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu's Fundamental Right Under Article 22(5) Was Violated Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation.

13 Oct 2006

The petitioner, mother of the detenu Manoj Sansare, challenged the detention order dated 22nd September 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Bri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay — Failure to Explain Gap Between Prejudicial Activities and Detention Order Breaks Live Link and Vitiates Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Explain Delay of Over Three Months.

17 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Rajesh Vasant Jadhav, challenged an order of detention dated 30th June 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Greater Bombay, unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Acquittal in Criminal Cases Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority did not consider material fact of acquittal in two criminal cases, vitiating subjective satisfaction.

2 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Ashok Dadu Mangale, challenged a detention order dated 3/3/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai under Section 3(2)...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)