Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Order in Cable Operator Entertainment Duty Case — Compounding Provision Misused as Adjudication Mechanism. Section 9A of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 cannot be invoked for determining duty and penalty without a proper adjudication under Section 7.
25 Apr 2012The petitioner, Vimal Balbhim Nangane, was a cable operator in Mumbai Suburban District. The Collector issued a notice on 15 January 2004 alleging tha...






