Search Results for "Composite mark"

Trending :

Search Results for "Composite mark"

137 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Scope of Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act in International Commercial Disputes. Multiple Issues Framed on Reference to Arbitration in Multi-Party Joint Venture Agreements.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute arose from a series of joint venture and ancillary agreements executed between Indian company Chloro Controls (I) P. Ltd. and foreign coll...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Petitioners in Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Exclusive Rights to Manufacture Ice Cream Under 'Vadilal' Brand in Designated Territories Preserved Pending Arbitration Arising from 1993 Family Settlement.

30 Jun 2026

Shailesh R. Gandhi, Bela S. Gandhi, and Vadilal Dairy International Limited (formerly Super Milk Makers Private Limited) filed a petition under Sectio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Dismisses Claimants' Cross-Objection in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence and Lack of Proof of Income. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding of 50% contributory negligence but reduced the notional income and set aside future prospects, resulting in a reduced award of Rs. 13,76,000/-.

5 Feb 2026

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, a 55-year-old vegetable vendor, who died in a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Composite Suit for Trademark and Design Infringement with Liberty to File Separate Suits. Trial Court Retains Jurisdiction to Permit Withdrawal Despite Section 19 Defence Under Designs Act, 2000, as Section 22(4) Does Not Mandate Immediate Transfer.

14 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Essdee Industries, challenged an order of the District Court at Pune that allowed the respondent, Esbee Eectrotech LLP, to withdraw it...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Batch of Motor Accident Claims Appeals Against Awards of Additional MACT, Kumta. Claimants Seek Enhancement of Compensation and Insurers Challenge Liability in Multiple Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Cases.

28 Mar 2019

The matter involves a batch of appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 31.12.2011 pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sales Tax Assessment Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners Failed to Show Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Remedy of Reference Under Section 61(1) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

20 Jan 2015

The petitioners, Tata Sons Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Injunction Set Aside Due to Vague Pleadings and Lack of Prima Facie Case. The court held that without proper proof of trademark ownership and clear pleadings, an interim injunction cannot be granted under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

21 Sep 2013

The case involves an appeal against an interim injunction granted by the Principal District Judge, Pune, restraining the appellants from using the tra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)