Search Results for "Company Liquidation"

401 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 401 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Restrain Alienation of Property. Balance of convenience favored grant of ad-interim relief to protect subject matter of petition under Sections 397, 398 of Companies Act, 1956.

The present appeal arises from a Company Petition No. 149 of 2012 filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, alleging oppression and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Successful Resolution Applicant Seeking Stay of Liquidation Order. Failure to Deposit Balance Amount Within Stipulated Time Leads to Forfeiture of Right to Seek Extension.

The Appellant, Mr. C. Sivasami, was the successful resolution applicant and promoter of M/s. Topknit Processing Mills Pvt. Ltd., the Corporate Debtor....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Transfer of Winding Up Petition to NCLT Despite Admission Order. Discretion Under Section 434(1)(c) Companies Act, 2013 Properly Exercised Where Liquidation Was at Initial Stage and No Irreversible Steps Taken.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Action Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. against the Delhi High Court's order transferring a winding up petition to the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Criminal Complaints Under Section 138 NI Act Not Covered by Company Law Moratorium. The expression 'suit or other proceedings' in Sections 442 and 446(1) of Companies Act, 1956 does not include criminal proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a reference to resolve a conflict between two Single Judge judgments of the Bombay High Court regarding whether criminal complaints ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Against Labour Court Orders in Recovery Proceedings Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Held That Assignee Bank Steps Into Shoes of Transferor and Is Liable for Pre-Transfer Claims of Workmen.

The petitioners, the Authorized Officer and Chairman & Managing Director of IDBI Bank (Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund), filed four writ petitions ...