Search Results for "Common ground"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Common ground"

9188 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9188 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Three Appellants for Murder Under Section 302/34 IPC — Common Intention Established Despite Acquittal of Co-Accused. The court held that acquittal of co-accused on benefit of doubt does not entitle others to same benefit if evidence against them is consistent, and common intention can be inferred from prearranged plan and concerted action even if one accused is unarmed.

30 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Subed Ali and two others against their conviction under Section 302/34 IPC for the murder of Abdul Mot...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Partner in Joint Decree for Goods Supplied, Holding That Appeal Under Order 41 Rule 4 CPC Is Maintainable Despite Non-Service on Co-Defendant. Joint Decree Against Two Partners Could Be Challenged by One Partner Alone as Ground of Liability Was Common, Following Karam Singh Sobti Precedent.

15 Apr 1969

The dispute arose from a suit filed by Firm Lalmandas Chhadammalal against the partnership firm Mohan Singh Ratan Lal, through its partners Mohan Sing...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Orders Against Two Firms in WCL Tender Dispute — Lack of Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that blacklisting a contractor without prior notice and hearing is arbitrary and unsustainable under Article 14 of the Constitution.

30 Nov 2023

The petitioners, M/s H.D. Enterprises (HDE) and M/s Gaurav Contracts Company (GCC), had entered into a joint venture/consortium agreement on 23.05.201...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Motion to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit: Arrest of M.V. Rainbow Ace Challenged on Ground of Non-Establishment of Common Beneficial Ownership Between Vessel Owner and Defaulting Charterer. Defendant Vessel Owner Asserts No Common Beneficial Ownership with Charterer, Seeking to Vacate Ex-Parte Arrest Order in Maritime Claim for Damages Under Voyage Charterparty.

6 May 2013

In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Admiralty and Vice Admiralty jurisdiction, the applicant, owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, filed a not...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Title Dispute, Holds Res Judicata Not Applicable to Findings in Dismissed Suits. The State was not required to appeal findings in suits dismissed against it, and such findings do not bar the State from contesting the same issue in a related suit where a decree was passed against it.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a High Court order that dismissed the State's appeal in a land title dispute on grounds of res judicata. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave for Representative Suit in Tata Group Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that shareholders of different listed companies lack the same interest required under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC.

10 Jul 2017

The Plaintiffs, claiming to be shareholders of various listed companies of the Tata Group, filed a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Prima Facie Case Established for Protection of Possession. Court restrains defendant from interfering with plaintiff's possession of suit premises pending disposal of suit under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

12 Sep 2025

The plaintiff, Indiaideas.com Limited, filed a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction against Supreme Chambers Condominium and Supreme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging IPAB's Dismissal of Trade Mark Rectification Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. The Court Examines the Interplay Between Common Law Rights and Registered Trade Marks, Specifically Sections 27(2), 28, 47, and 57, in Context of Deceptive Similarity Between 'ROFOL' and 'PROFOL'.

3 Apr 2012

The dispute between Medical Technologies Limited (petitioner) and Neon Laboratories Limited (respondent no.1) concerned the trade marks 'PROFOL' and '...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)