Search Results for "Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017"

393 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 393 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Tax Refund Adjustment Order for Violation of Settlement Scheme and Natural Justice. Adjustment of refund for one tax period against demand for another under proviso to Section 50(1) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 held invalid when petitioner had applied under Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fees Act, 2023 and no defect notice was issued.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a proprietorship concern registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 challenging a settlement order dated 18 April...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.

3 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Summons Issued by DGGI Ahmedabad to Petitioners in Maharashtra for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Summons under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 must be issued by an officer having jurisdiction over the place of business of the person summoned.

28 Mar 2024

The petitioners, Shantanu Sanjay Hundekari, Vikas Agarwal, Yogesh Agarwal, and Mamta Gupta, are residents of Maharashtra and their place of business i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure Order Under Section 67(2) of CGST Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Seizure of cash from residential premises of an employee without proper authorization and recording of reasons held invalid, cash ordered to be returned.

20 Feb 2024

The petitioners, B. Kusuma Poonacha and J K Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.

12 Jul 2023

The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Service Tax Demand on Payment Aggregator Services for FY 2015-16. Services Provided by FIS Payment Solutions to Acquiring Banks for Settlement of Card Transactions Held Not Taxable as 'Business Auxiliary Service' Under Finance Act, 1994.

17 Mar 2023

The petitioner, FIS Payment Solutions and Services India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, provides payment aggre...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Refund Order in Favor of Vodafone Idea Limited Due to Alternative Remedy and Delay. The court held that the Revenue's writ petition was not maintainable as an alternative remedy of revision under Section 35A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was available, and the petition was barred by delay and laches.

4 Jul 2022

The case involves two writ petitions: one filed by Vodafone Idea Limited seeking implementation of a refund order, and another filed by the Revenue ch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Financier's Appeal in U.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Case, Upholding Tax Liability for Financier-in-Possession. Financier Qualifies as 'Owner' Under Section 2(h) and Must Pay Tax in Advance Under Section 4, with Refund Available Under Section 12 for Non-Use, Irrespective of Actual Use or Registration Status.

22 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Full Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Bench Lucknow, which dismissed a writ petition filed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeals in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Reassessment Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Are Invalid. The court held that reassessment under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 must be completed within four years from the end of the relevant tax period, and notices issued after that period are barred by limitation.

31 Aug 2018

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka against orders of a single judge quashing reassessment notices issued under Se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Limitation Case Under Section 144C. Nagarathna J. Holds That Section 144C Does Not Extend Limitation Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

This separate opinion by Nagarathna J. arises from civil appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)