Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948"

384 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 384 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation After Tillers' Day.

The petitioner, Shri Ananda Sakharam Padalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Section 32M Cannot Be Challenged After 9 Years. The Court Held That the Certificate Is Conclusive and the Landlord Cannot Seek Termination of Tenancy After the Tenant Has Purchased the Land.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding agricultural land bearing Gat No. 98 in village Tilleha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Port Trust Against Sub-Tenant — Eviction Order Restored Under Public Premises Act. Sub-tenant cannot claim protection under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act as premises are governed by the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

The petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai (a statutory corporation), filed a writ petition challenging an order of the City Civil Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — MRT Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Restoration of Possession Cannot Be Ordered Without Hearing the Landlord Under Section 84 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, Kacharu B. Ambekar and others, are the successors-in-interest of the original landlord of agricultural lands bearing Gat No.333 (47 A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Orders in Tenancy Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that petitioners failed to prove personal cultivation and that tenants were entitled to purchase land under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Madhav Dashrath Vahadane and Nivrutti Dashrath Vahadane (petitioners) challenging orders passed u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Purchase Price Fixed Under Section 32-G of Bombay Tenancy Act Is Final and Binding. Landlord's Challenge to Purchase Price and Tenancy Status Fails Due to Lack of Evidence and Delay.

The petitioner, the original landlord of agricultural land in Survey Nos. 15 and 16 of village Kurutanwadi, Taluka Chandgad, District Kolhapur, filed ...