Search Results for "Bombay Presidency Rules"

157 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 157 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 28A(1) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 in Probate Reference. Section 28A(1) is not inconsistent with Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Civil Judges can be invested with probate jurisdiction.

This judgment arises from a reference under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, made by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Retail Outlet Dealership Selection by Indian Oil Corporation — No Arbitrariness Found in Selection Process. Petitioner Failed to Establish Violation of Selection Criteria Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Anita Sidram Koli, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 (Indian Oil Corpora...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Insolvency Notice in Debt Recovery Matter — Debt Recovery Tribunal's Decree Constitutes a Final Judgment Under Section 9(2) of Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

The judgment debtor, Deepak Cochhar and another, filed a notice of motion seeking to set aside Insolvency Notice No. N/72 of 2004 issued by the Insolv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of States Reorganisation Act, 1956: Formation of Composite Bombay State Without Fresh Reference to State Legislature Upheld. Modification of Bill by Parliament Does Not Require Second Reference Under Proviso to Article 3 of the Constitution of India.

The case arose from a challenge to the constitutional validity of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956. Following the report of the States Reorganisati...