Search Results for "Bagalkot"

329 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 329 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Son's Petition Challenging Maintenance Order for Mother Under Senior Citizens Act. Mother's Right to Maintenance Upheld Despite Son's Claim of No Neglect, as Tribunal Found Willful Neglect and Son's Failure to Provide Support.

The case involves two writ petitions: one filed by Smt. Kallavva, an 83-year-old mother, seeking enforcement of a maintenance order passed by the Assi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Damages Suit. Section 125 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 does not bar civil suit for damages against co-operative society and its employees for acts outside the scope of the Act.

The petitioner, defendant No.3 (Branch Manager of Karnataka State Co-operative Consumer's Federation Ltd.), filed a Civil Revision Petition under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, and 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilty Mind Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Manasing Tukaram Lamani, was the accused in C.C. No. 208/2011 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalkot. He was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Tribunal Order Directing Consideration of Driver Candidate's Appointment in Excise Department. Court finds no error in KAT's direction to consider petitioner's case for appointment by creating supernumerary post.

The case involves two writ petitions: one filed by Nagaraj Y. Talwar (W.P.No.117767/2019) challenging the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal's order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that Order 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence or to allow a party to adduce additional evidence after closure of evidence.

The petitioners, who are defendants in a partition suit, filed a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010366622012_1

...