Search Results for "BEST Bus"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "BEST Bus"

308 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 308 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Penalty of Reduction in Pay with Cumulative Effect in MSRTC Driver's Disciplinary Case. Acquittal in Criminal Case Under Bombay Prohibition Act Does Not Automatically Exonerate Employee in Departmental Proceedings, But Penalty Must Be Proportionate to Misconduct.

18 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and order dated 13.7.2017 passed by the Industrial Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows MSRTC's Petition in Driver's Disciplinary Case, Upholds Setting Aside of Penalty but Reduces Back Wages. Acquittal in Criminal Case Under Bombay Prohibition Act Does Not Automatically Exonerate Employee, But Penalty Must Be Proportionate to Misconduct.

18 Oct 2023

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the order of the Industrial Court, Kolhapur, which partly allowed the complaint fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Disability Certificate Issued by Medical Board in BEST Employee Case. The Court held that the employer cannot challenge the disability certificate without independent evidence, and the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 is not maintainable.

12 Aug 2020

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Upholds Compensation for Death of Tippu Sultan Nadaf. Claimants entitled to compensation as legal representatives under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, even if not financially dependent on deceased.

21 Aug 2019

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The deceased, Tippu Sultan Nadaf, died in a road accident on 22.12.2010. The claima...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Multiplier Applied as per Sarla Verma Guidelines. The Court modified the compensation by applying multiplier '13' instead of '14' for a deceased aged 46 years, reducing the award from Rs. 14,35,000 to Rs. 13,36,000.

21 Aug 2019

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased Tippu Sultan Nadaf, who died in a road acciden...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Mother's Appeal in NRI Child Custody Dispute — Best Interest of Child Requires Full Hearing Before Return. The Court set aside the High Court's order for immediate return of children to the US, directing the Family Court to decide custody based on welfare, not merely on comity or habitual residence.

15 Mar 2019

The case involves a custody dispute between Lahari Sakhamuri (mother/appellant) and Sobhan Kodali (father/respondent) over their two minor children, b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

29 Jun 2017

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Remands Disproportionate Punishment Case to Industrial Court for Fresh Determination of Quantum. Industrial Court's Power to Interfere with Punishment Under MRTU & PULP Act Upheld, but Remand Ordered for Proper Application of Proportionality Principle.

16 Aug 2016

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, which had set aside the punishment of perman...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Disproportionate Punishment. Industrial Court's Power to Interfere with Punishment Under MRTU and PULP Act Upheld — Permanent Stoppage of Increments for Outraging Modesty Found Disproportionate.

16 Aug 2016

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, which had set aside the punishment of perman...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No Contributory Negligence and Multiplier of 15 Upheld. Deceased pedestrian aged 45 years; Tribunal's award under Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 confirmed as appellant failed to prove contributory negligence and multiplier applied as per Sarla Verma.

6 May 2013

The appellant, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Limited (MSRTC), owner of a ST bus involved in an accident, challenged the award of compen...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)