Search Results for "BDA Act, 1976"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "BDA Act, 1976"

116 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 116 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

High Court

Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Land Acquisition After Preliminary Notification – Karnataka High Court | Arkavathi Layout Case

20 Jan 2026

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order/report dated 23.02.2023 passed by t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in BDA Allotment Dispute — Upholds Validity of Sale Deed Despite Non-Registration of Agreement. Single Judge's Order Quashing Allotment Set Aside as Allottee Had Paid Full Consideration and Possession Was Delivered.

30 Sep 2024

The case involves two writ appeals arising from a single judge's order in WP No.11179/2020 dated 21.06.2022. The appellant in WA No.593/2024, Sri Ravi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Interim Application in Land Acquisition Case Under Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Acquisition proceedings for Peripheral Ring Road lapsed as compensation was not paid nor possession taken before commencement of the 2013 Act under Section 24(2), rendering interim relief infructuous.

20 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Peripheral Ring Road (PRR) around Bangalore, initiated by the Bangalore Development Author...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows BDA's Appeal in Execution Proceedings: Right, Title or Interest Must Be Adjudicated Under Order XXI Rule 101 CPC. The Court held that an obstructor claiming title need not prove possession to be heard in execution proceedings.

6 Dec 2021

The case involves an appeal by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) against the dismissal of its applications under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC in exec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Winding Up of Bangalore Development Authority for Non-Payment of Arbitral Award. Court holds that a statutory authority cannot be wound up under the Companies Act, 2013, and the remedy lies in execution of the award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Sep 2019

The petitioner, IL&FS Engineering and Construction Company Ltd. (formerly Maytas Infra Ltd.), a company engaged in infrastructure construction, had an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs BDA to Allot Alternate Site to Purchaser After Original Site Acquired for Road Widening — Petitioner Entitled to Alternate Site at Same Price as Original Allotment

28 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Smt. N. Dhakshayini, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the responde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs BDA to Allot Alternate Site to Purchaser After Original Site Acquired for Road Widening. The court held that the BDA's action of taking over the site without notice was arbitrary and violative of natural justice, and directed allotment of an alternate site from available vacant sites.

28 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Smt. N. Dhakshayini, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the responde...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)