Search Results for "Article 300-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Article 300-A"

299 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 299 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Statue Beautification Due to Non-Compliance with RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition Initiated Without Following Mandatory Preliminary Steps Under Sections 4 and 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Violating Article 300A of the Constitution.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Dr. Chandrashekhar Gattani, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of his land bearing Nazul Plot No. 41/1, admeasuring 660...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Koyna Project-Affected Persons Seeking Rehabilitation Land — Cancellation of Allotment Without Hearing Set Aside. State Directed to Allot Alternative Land Within Six Weeks as Petitioners' Eligibility Was Undisputed.

21 Feb 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of Waman Ganpatrao Kadam, owned lands in Velhe, Satara, acquired for the Koyna Project in 1961. They claimed they receive...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stop Work Notice Issued by Pune Municipal Corporation Based on Proposed Prison Construction — Petitioner's Project Found Beyond 150 Meters from Prison Perimeter Wall, No Legal Basis for Restriction. The court held that rules under Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894, do not regulate construction beyond the perimeter walls of a Central Prison, and that property rights under Article 300A of the Constitution cannot be interfered with based on future proposals without legal backing.

27 Aug 2024

The Petitioner, Fortune Developers and Infrastructure, owned a portion of property surveyed under No.154 at Yerawada, Pune, and had already constructe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge Order for Restoration of Possession or Compensation. Land Acquisition Lapses Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years of Award.

7 Jul 2023

The State of Karnataka filed an intra-court appeal challenging the order dated 13.01.2021 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.61563/2011 (LA-RE...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Landowners' Challenge to Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Laws Revival Act, 2019 on Grounds of Separation of Powers and Constitutional Invalidity. The Court held that legislative revival of enactments declared unconstitutional due to repugnancy under Article 254 of the Constitution is impermissible without re-enactment and fresh Presidential assent, as it overrules judicial determination and violates constitutional limits.

29 Jun 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil original jurisdiction writ petition, addressed a constitutional dispute concerning the separation of powers and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Amendments to Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Deletion of 'Trader' from Section 72 and Insertion of Rule 76-A are Unconstitutional.

12 Oct 2017

The present proceedings comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Bank Employee's Petition Against Unilateral Withholding of Pension. Pension is a property right and cannot be stopped without show cause notice or disciplinary proceedings under Bank of Maharashtra Pension Regulations.

1 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Devanand s/o Galomal Nichwani, was a computer operator/clerk at Bank of Maharashtra, Jaripatka Branch, Nagpur. He opted for voluntary ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition of Retired Judicial Member of Railway Claims Tribunal — Notification Denying Pension Quashed as Ultra Vires and Unconstitutional. Pension is a right under Article 300A and denial without authority of law is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16.

7 May 2012

The petitioner, Prabhakar H. Parab, a retired Judicial Member of the Railway Claims Tribunal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down LIC Circular Imposing Assignment Charge on Finance Organizations as Ultra Vires Section 38 of Insurance Act, 1938. The court held that LIC cannot impose a charge on assignments of life insurance policies in favor of finance companies as it amounts to a restriction on the statutory right of assignment under Section 38.

19 May 2010

The petitioners, Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. (a Non-Banking Finance Company) and its director Hasmukh Rawal, challenged a Circular dated 24.4.2006 issued...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)