Search Results for "Anti-Corruption"

61 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Sales Tax Officer in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Manilal Bhikhabhai Makwana, was a Sales Tax Officer in Ahmedabad. The complainant, Himanshu Jayantibhai Patel, was a honey trader. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Plausible Defence of Handloan. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 26-04-2006 passed by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Sub-Inspector and Private Individual in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was a stock witness and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Jawansingh Ramsingh Gaud (a Sub-Inspector of Police) and Umesh Manohar Ambre (a private individual), were convicted by the Special Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Failed Trap and Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as initial demand was not corroborated and trap failed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, clerks at Pune Municipal Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Failed Trap and Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as initial demand was not corroborated and trap did not succeed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, clerks at Pune Municipal Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution Failed to Establish that Accused Made a Demand for Illegal Gratification as Required Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Annasaheb Mahadev Bhandare (the accused) by the Special Judge, Kolhapur, in a corruption ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other and Complainant's Testimony is Unreliable Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Laxman s/o Narayan Kale, a government servant working with Nagpur Improvement Trust, was convicted by the Special Judge for demanding a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses CBI Revision Against Dropping of Charges Against Former Maharashtra Chief Minister Ashok Chavan in Adarsh Housing Society Scam. Court holds that sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory and its absence vitiates proceedings.

The case pertains to the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society scam, where government land admeasuring about 3758 sq.mtrs in Block-VI at Colaba, Mumbai, ...