Search Results for "Aircraft Rules"

75 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 75 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Service Element of Disability Pension for Sailor Discharged After 10 Years in Low Medical Category. Regulation 107 of Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 Entitles Personnel with Less Than 15 Years Service to Proportional Service Element.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Kochi, which held that the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Rebate Claim Case Due to Limitation Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act. Rebate of duty on exports is governed by the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B, as 'refund' includes 'rebate' under Explanation (A) to that section.

The appellant, Sansera Engineering Limited, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported goods between August 2015 and October 2015 and filed claims fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Height Clearance NOC Dispute in Slum Rehabilitation Project. Court Directs AAI to Issue NOC for 84.92 Meters AMSL, Rejects AAI’s Argument of Lapsed Application Due to Minor Procedural Lapses

Procedural Lapses vs. Substantive Compliance: The Court held that minor procedural lapses, such as the absence of the signatory’s name and witn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Marine Insurance Claim. The Court upheld the arbitrator's finding that goods destroyed by fire at a CFS warehouse were covered under the FOB clause of the Marine Cargo Open Policy.

The case involves a challenge by Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited (the petitioner/insurer) to an arbitral award passed in favor of M/s. Manh...