Search Results for "Accidental consumption"

61 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Food Safety Act Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors cannot be held liable under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 without specific averments of their role in the offence.

The petitioners, including a company and its erstwhile directors, challenged an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, which dismissed their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for wife's murder set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramkisan Vishnu Nagare, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Sunita, by the Addit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging MCZMA's Refusal of CRZ Clearance for Occupancy Certificate. MCZMA cannot refuse clearance on ground of mismatch between DCR 1991 and DCR 1967 when construction was lawfully permitted under DCR 1991.

The petitioner, MRK Enterprises, a partnership firm, owned a property known as 'Amir House' at Colaba, Mumbai. The petitioner sought a Coastal Zone Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Marlingappa, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge at Yadgiri for offences under Sections 302 and 498-A of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death caused by accidental fall, not intentional poisoning.

The appellant, Rama Ghongde, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his son Ashutosh by poisoning. The prosecution case was that the ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction in Bride Burning Case — Act Falls Under Section 300 Fourthly IPC, Not Exception 4. Pouring kerosene and setting a pregnant wife on fire constitutes murder despite subsequent attempt to pour water.

The appellant, Suraj Jagannath Jadhav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of his wife by pouring kerosene o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder and Criminal Intimidation Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Dying Declaration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 506 IPC confirmed as prosecution proved chain of circumstances leading to guilt of accused.

The appellant, Prakash Suryakant Lad, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for the murder of Sadhana Ahir and for criminal intimidation. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of his master confirmed as chain of circumstances including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon was complete.

The appellant, Baban Tukaram Kapse, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Wardha, for the murder of his master Govinda Ganpatrao Girde under Section 30...