Search Results for "wholly and exclusively"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "wholly and exclusively"

1022 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1022 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Patent Infringement Suit — Director's Authority to Sue Not Barred by Absence of Board Resolution at Plaint Stage. The court held that Order 29 Rule 1 CPC allows a director to sign and verify pleadings, and the absence of a board resolution is not a ground for rejection under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC.

2 Sep 2014

The appellant, M/s. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the respondent, Celem S.A., in the District Court at Nashik seeking a declaratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband, Son, and Brother-in-Law for Murder by Throttling. Eyewitness Account of Minor Daughter Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence.

14 Feb 2011

The appellants, Arvind Ananda Bandal (husband of the deceased), Bajirao Arvind Bandal (son), and Hanmant Ananda Bandal (brother of Arvind), were convi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition for Unascertained Damages Claim — Lock-in Period License Fee Not a Debt Under Companies Act, 1956. Claim for balance license fee after premature vacation is a claim for damages requiring adjudication, not a debt due and payable under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

28 Feb 2014

The petitioning-creditor, Indiabulls Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, against ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Based on Single Interested Witness and Hostile Witnesses Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC.

19 Apr 2024

The case arises from a murder that occurred on 19th September 2001 in Babanagar village, Bijapur, Karnataka. The deceased, Malagounda, was the son of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence; Judgment Text Incomplete as to Verdict. Accused Convicted Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC for Throwing Wife and Child into Well, Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Testimony.

2 Aug 2017

The appellant, Sambhaji Kachru Kolhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code fo...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Goonda Act in Favor of Detenue's Wife Due to Procedural Violations. Preventive Detention Invalid for Failure to Follow Section 8 Safeguards and Provide Effective Representation Under Article 22(5).

19 Jul 2023

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by Smt. B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings for Offences Under IPC in Relation to Forged Document Produced in Court. Petitioner Argues Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Renders Cognizance Without Jurisdiction.

2 Aug 2022

The petitioner, Smt. Latha Rajanikanth, approached the High Court of Karnataka under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking to qu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

4 Sep 2023

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition for Disputed Debt and Lack of Jurisdiction — Foreign Company Cannot Seek Winding-Up of Indian Company Under Sections 433(e), 434 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that a winding-up petition is not maintainable when the debt is bona fide disputed and the petitioner is a foreign company without a registered office in India.

28 Jul 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Arasor Corporation, a company incorporated in the United States of America, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

47 48 49 50 51

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)