NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018
27 Feb 2019...
Search Results for "Potential Value"
1043 result(s) found
Found 1043 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Division Bench Hears State Appeals Against Single Judge Order Quashing Development Charge Deduction. The Single Judge had declared that applying a blanket 33.33% deduction towards development charges in land acquisition compensation awards was impermissible without justification.
23 Jul 2026The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard three connected writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and its officials against a common order da...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Upholding Ancestry-Based Classification. The Court Affirms That Distinction Between 'Pushtaini' and 'Gair-Pushtaini' Landholders for Compensation Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Related Rules Has a Reasonable Nexus with Rehabilitation Objectives.
20 Feb 2023The appeals arose from a judgment and order dated 30 March 2018 by a Full Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which upheld a classific...
- 306
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Compensation Award in Land Acquisition Case and Remands for Fresh Determination. The Court held that reliance on a consent award for a subsequent acquisition and guesswork is erroneous under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as compensation must be based on comparable evidence and proper market value assessment.
22 Mar 2022The dispute arose from land acquisition by the State for improving the Ranganathittu Bird Sanctuary, with a Section 4 notification issued in 2008. The...
- 261
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Additional Amenity TDR in Garden Reservation Case — Municipal Corporation Cannot Deny TDR for Land Reserved for Garden on Grounds of Non-Construction of Road. Held that once land is reserved for a garden and developed as such, the owner is entitled to additional amenity TDR under DCR 33(9) read with Section 126 of the MRTP Act, 1966, irrespective of whether a road is constructed.
3 Apr 2024The petitioners, Vijay Nagar Apartments (a partnership firm) and its partner Dhaval Ajmera, owned approximately 98,369.1 square meters of land in Vill...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Appellant Entitled to Same Rate as Other Land Owners in Similar Acquisition. The Court held that the appellant's application under Section 28-A was maintainable and not barred by limitation, and directed re-determination of compensation at Rs. 250 per sq.ft. after 35% deduction for development.
13 Mar 2023The appellant, Namdeo Banduji Mahure, owned land in Mouza Arni, District Yavatmal, which was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the construction...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Found in Favor of Plaintiff. Agreement to Sell and Part Payment Established, Injunction to Prevent Alienation Upheld Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.
1 Aug 2025The present appeal arises from an order dated 12.02.2025 passed by the Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru, allowing I.A. Nos...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Charity Commissioner's Permission for Sale of Trust Property Due to Inadequate Price and Non-Compliance with Section 36(1)(a) of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. Court holds that the price offered was not the market price and the order lacked proper consideration of the property's value.
8 Jul 2011The petitioner, a trustee of Shriram Mandir Deosthan Trust, challenged an order dated 15/02/2011 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur, gra...
- 64
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal by Coal Company Challenging Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value of Rs.74,000 per Hectare Upheld Based on Comparable Sale Instances of Adjacent Land. The court affirmed that sale instances of small plots in the same vicinity can be used to determine market value for large tracts, considering potential for development.
19 Jul 2017The appellant, Western Coal Fields Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 31.01.2006 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandrapur in ...
- 61
