Search Results for "2021 Office Memorandum"

596 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 596 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Division Bench Hears Appeal on Wakf Board's Authority Under Scheme Decree. Dispute Over Applicability of Section 66 of Tamil Nadu Waqf Act, 1995 for Appointment of Mutawalli to Dargah Governed by 1939 Scheme Decree.

The matter arises from a writ appeal filed by the Chief Executive Officer of the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board against an order of a Single Judge directing th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Drug Manufacturer in NSQ Case Due to Prejudicial Delay in Testing. Delay of 20 Months in Analysis of Drug Sample Violated Right to Challenge Government Analyst's Report Under Section 25(3) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by M/s Zim Laboratories Ltd. and its officers (the manufact...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Finding That Hindu Joint Family Was Not in Existence. Kabuliyat Executed in 1955 and Subsequent Conduct of Parties Established Separation, Barring Claim for Share in Suit Property.

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition and separate possession of a house property situated in Wardha. The plaintiffs claimed that the suit prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC Application in Suit for Specific Performance. Court Holds That Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application and a Writ Petition filed by M/s J.M. Baxi & Co. (the applicant/petitioner) challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment and Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order in Service Charges Dispute. Applicant Company Held to be Necessary Party as Successor-in-Interest of Defendant Firm Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioners, Tarun Keshrichand Shah and Priyalata Keshrichand Shah, filed a suit (Suit No. 6117 of 2007) against M/s. Kishore Engineering Co. (res...