Search Results for "section 24(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 24(2)"

512 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 512 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Invoke Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. The Court held that a person who purchases land after the acquisition process is complete has no locus standi to claim lapse of acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

18 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi against an order of the High Court of Delhi allowing a writ petition filed by the respon...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal, Quashes High Court Order Declaring Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Subsequent Purchaser Has No Locus to Challenge Acquisition, Overruling Manav Dharma Trust

4 May 2023

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) appealed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which allowed a writ petition filed by Narendra Kumar Jain...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal Against Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Possession Taken Prior to Act's Commencement Precludes Deemed Lapse Despite Non-Payment of Compensation.

28 Apr 2023

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which declared that the acquisition of land in question had lapse...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landowners' Claim in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Payment of Compensation. Acquisition Proceedings Deemed to Have Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Compensation Was Not Actually Paid Despite Being Tendered.

11 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal challenging the Delhi High Court's order that declared land acquisition proceedings had lapsed under Section 24(...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Land Acquisition Authority in Land Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Possession Taken and Land Put to Use Prior to 2013 Act Precludes Deemed Lapse.

10 Apr 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Land and Building Department of the NCT of Delhi and others against a judgment of the High Court of Delhi. The High...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Overturns High Court's Lapsing Declaration. Constitution Bench decision in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal overrules earlier precedent, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not apply where possession has been taken but compensation not paid.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acqu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of Act, 2013 — High Court Order Declaring Acquisition Lapsed Set Aside. Compensation Deposit in Treasury Not Equivalent to Deposit Under Section 31(2) of 1894 Act; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves appeals by the State of Haryana against a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which declared that the acquisition o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Govt. of NCT of Delhi in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Deemed Not Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Possession Taken in 1983, Compensation Not Tendered, but Twin Conditions of Possession and Compensation Must Both Be Unsatisfied for Lapse.

15 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the Delhi High Court's judgment dated 01.12.2015 in Writ Petition (C) No.27 of 2015, which declared th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases by Quashing High Court's Lapse Declarations. High Court's Application of Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Found Contrary to Constitution Bench Precedent Establishing Lapse Requires Both Non-Possession and Non-Payment of Compensation.

26 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court heard four civil appeals filed by the Delhi Development Authority and Government of NCT of Delhi against judgments of the Delhi High...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. The Court Held That Deemed Lapse Requires Both Non-Taking of Possession and Non-Payment of Compensation, Overruling Prior Precedent and Excluding Stay Periods, Thereby Reversing High Court's Declaration of Lapse.

29 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Government of NCT of Delhi against a judgment of the H...

45 46 47 48 49

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)