Search Results for "deficit amount"

776 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 776 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Doctor in Motorcycle Accident Due to Negligent Driving of Chhakda Rickshaw. Claimant's Income Assessed at Rs.2,25,000 per annum with 40% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 16 Applied for Loss of Earning Capacity.

The appellant, Tejasbhai Champaklal Shah, a 32-year-old doctor, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Incorrect Multiplier Application. Multiplier of 18 Applied for Deceased Aged 25 Years Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Enhancing Compensation from Rs.1,92,158 to Rs.5,23,600.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of Haribhai Panchal, who died in a road accident on 26.02.1995. The dece...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Deduction of Personal Expenses. Tribunal's deduction of 1/3rd towards personal expenses for a bachelor was incorrect; 50% deduction applied as per Sarla Verma guidelines, and future prospects added.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux), Patan in MACP No.5400 of 2002...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Case — Enhances Compensation for Masonry Worker's Death. Future Prospects and Conventional Heads Added Following Pranay Sethi Principles.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 28.04.2017 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux), Junagadh, in Motor Accident C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Booth Allottee for Persistent Default in Payment - Resumption Order Confirmed. Rank defaulter not entitled to relief despite multiple opportunities; Article 142 cannot protect unscrupulous buyer who paid only 25% of sale consideration and defaulted for 23 years.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Rajiv Vohra against the State of Haryana and others, confirming the resumption order passed by the Est...