Search Results for "Vendor Not Party"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Appointment Norms of Information Commissioners ...
Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question of Quashing Non-Compoundable O...

Search Results for "Vendor Not Party"

719 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 719 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings Set Aside for Failure to Consider Adverse Possession and Limitation. The Court held that the trial court and first appellate court erred in not framing an issue on limitation and adverse possession despite evidence of long possession by the appellants, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

12 Mar 2020

The appellants, original defendants, filed a Second Appeal against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and the first appellate court decreeing t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff's Averments in Plaint Sufficient to Satisfy Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

15 Mar 2019

The appellant-original defendant filed a second appeal against the concurrent decrees for specific performance of an agreement to sell passed by the t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Petitioner Lacks Title and Possessory Rights Over Disputed Property. Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is not appropriate for adjudication of disputed questions of title and possession; mutation entries do not confer title.

22 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Walter Stephen Mendes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karn...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Records — Petitioner Fails to Establish Title or Possession Over Disputed Property. Mutation entries do not confer title; disputed questions of title and possession cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

22 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Walter Stephen Mendes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impounding of Unregistered MoU Under Stamp Act in Civil Suit — Trial Court's Rejection Set Aside. Section 33 of Maharashtra Stamp Act Mandates Impounding of Insufficiently Stamped Documents Irrespective of Registration Requirement Under Section 49 of Registration Act.

23 Jan 2018

The petitioners, Yuvraj Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Dismissal in Default Under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC Does Not Bar Subsequent Suit for Partition. The bar under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC applies only when the earlier suit was dismissed in default and the subsequent suit is on the same cause of action; a suit for partition is a continuing cause of action and hence not barred.

16 Jun 2017

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for partition and separate possess...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

24 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years. Inordinate Delay and Violation of Natural Justice Render Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Unsustainable.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Madan Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Div...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Moto Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Held Invalid for Lack of Reasonable Time and Violation of Natural Justice.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Dyanoba S/o Bapurao Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Amendment Application in Civil Suit — Amendment Sought After 11 Years and After Commencement of Trial Held Not Bonafide and Would Cause Prejudice to Opposite Party.

27 Oct 2010

The petitioners, who were defendants in Special Civil Suit No.123 of 1990 filed by the predecessor of respondents No.1 to 8, challenged the order date...

45 46 47 48 49

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)