CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.902 OF 2014
1 Oct 2014...
Search Results for "disciplinary jurisdiction"
1782 result(s) found
Found 1782 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Bank's Dismissal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceedings for Fraud and Misconduct. Disciplinary Proceedings Evaluated on Preponderance of Probabilities, Not Criminal Standards, Under Bipartite Settlement and Evidence Act Provisions.
19 Jan 2022The dispute arose from the dismissal of a bank employee following departmental proceedings initiated by the appellant-Bank, a nationalized entity, aga...
- 301
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes IBBI Circular as Ultra Vires in Insolvency Professional Regulation — Circular Purporting to Clarify Regulation 4(2)(b) of LP Regulations Held to Be an Impermissible Retrospective Amendment.
4 Apr 2024The petitioner, Amit Gupta, a chartered accountant and registered insolvency professional, challenged a circular dated 28 September 2023 issued by the...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Police Constable Challenging Dismissal Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Non-Supply of Inquiry Report and Denial of Cross-Examination Vitiate Disciplinary Proceedings Under Maharashtra Police Rules.
5 Apr 2024The petitioner, Shivanand Hanmant Bobade, a Police Constable serving in Sangli, Maharashtra, was subjected to departmental proceedings and dismissed f...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher with Full Backwages. Termination of a teacher without prior approval under Section 5(3) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 is void ab initio, and reinstatement with full backwages is the normal rule.
17 Oct 2023The case involves a challenge by Vidya Vikas Education Society and its school (Petitioners) against the judgment of the School Tribunal dated 31 Janua...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Cotton Federation Dispute — Labour Court Order Quashed for Interfering at Show Cause Stage. Show Cause Notice Proposing Punishment Cannot Be Challenged Under MRTU & PULP Act Before Final Order.
7 Jan 2014The petitioners, Maharashtra State Cooperative Cotton Growers Marketing Federation Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 29/02/2010 of the Lab...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Treating Suspension Period as Qualifying Service for Pension. The Court held that under Rules 37 and 50 of the Railway Service (Pension) Rules, 1993, an employee compulsorily retired is entitled to have the suspension period counted as qualifying service for pension.
4 Feb 2014The respondent, J.S. Kharat, was employed by the Central Railway since 1964 as a Driver 'C'. On 25.12.1985, he was placed under suspension due to invo...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging ICC Report Omission in POSH Act Case — Petitioner's Grievance Limited to Non-Naming of Alleged Instigator, Not Maintainable Under Article 226. The court held that the ICC's omission to name the alleged instigator did not cause prejudice and that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of seeking disciplinary action.
20 Apr 2026The petitioner, Shrinivas Shinde, a Lower Division Clerk employed with the Directorate of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship (Respondent No. 1), fil...
- 117
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Suspension Order of Group C Employee Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 10(4)(b) of KCS (CCA) Rules, 1957 — Suspension Without Contemplation of Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid. The court held that the suspension order must record reasons and be based on contemplation of disciplinary proceedings, failing which it is unsustainable.
11 Jun 2021The petitioner, Shri S. Nagaraja, a Group C employee working as a Second Division Assistant at the Shivamogga City Corporation, challenged an order da...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Employer Failed to Prove Voluntary Abandonment of Service; Termination Without Specific Order Held Illegal.
10 Oct 2017The petitioner, M/s. Empire Dyeing, a textile processing company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a c...
- 101
