Search Results for "dangerous activities"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PASA Act for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Preventive detention under Section 3(2) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify detention without evidence of public order disturbance.

5 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Vasnaben @ Vasantiben Rameshbhai Luvariya (Luvadiya), through her husband Luvariya Rameshbhai Shambhubhai, filed a Special Criminal Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Delayed Action. Preventive detention order set aside due to unexplained delay of four months and failure to supply legible translated documents.

9 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Bandu Kathalu Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 17.01.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Beed under the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Removal of Petrol Pumps Near Bibi Ka Maqbara Heritage Site. Court directs relocation of petrol pumps within 500 meters of the protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and Heritage Regulations.

24 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Mr. Shahid Aslam, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking the removal of petrol pum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Representation to Advisory Board. Failure to Forward Detenu's Representation to Advisory Board Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 10 of MPDA Act.

6 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Rupesh Ram Thakur, challenged an order of detention dated 17 October 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dang...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Failure to Furnish Bail Application and Order Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

27 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Dhanaji Nivrutti Patil, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 21st July 2017 passed by the District Magistrate, Sangli, un...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Waging War Against State Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Conviction under Sections 121, 122, 124A IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of incriminating articles and recovery was not witnessed by independent persons.

20 Jul 2016

The appellant, Abdul Raheman @ Shami Ahmed Sha, was convicted by the Fast Track Court No.I at Gulbarga in Sessions Case No.316/2006 for offences under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation — Right to Make Effective Representation Violated Under Article 22(5) of Constitution. The court held that the failure to consider the detenu's representation expeditiously renders the continued detention illegal, emphasizing the constitutional safeguard under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

30 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Ashish Robert Felix, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPD Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Unexplained Delay of Over 30 Days in Deciding Representation Violates Fundamental Right Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

24 Jun 2014

The petitioner, Ajay Suresh Alande, brother of the detenu Chetan Suresh Alande, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the detention order dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Disturbance — Demand of Money from Individual Worker Does Not Affect Public Order. The court held that an incident of demanding money from a single person, without more, does not disturb public order and cannot justify preventive detention under Section 3 of the MPDA Act.

28 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Vinod Ramjiyawan Rajbhar, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offend...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Gap of Nearly One Year Between Issuance and Execution Without Reconsideration of Changed Circumstances. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider That Detenu Was in Judicial Custody at Time of Execution, Though on Bail When Order Was Issued.

5 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Shri Raja @ Rajesh Rajan Nair, challenged his detention order dated 30th September 2003 issued under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dan...

44 45 46 47 48

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)