Search Results for "Detenue"

530 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 530 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detenu's Right to Liberty Upheld as Detaining Authority Did Not Apply Mind to Necessity of Detention Over Criminal Prosecution.

The petitioner, Omkar Rajendra Bhosle, challenged a preventive detention order dated 3rd March 2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City, u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Detention Order Under M.P.D.A. Act Due to Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Subjective Satisfaction of Detaining Authority Vitiated as Statements Not Independently Verified.

The petitioner, Sourabh Kalu Koli, challenged an order of detention dated 7th March 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Kolhapur (Respondent No.2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in MPDA Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Evidence Linking Detenu to Offences. Detenu's Name Not in FIRs and In-camera Statements Not Verified by Competent Authority.

The petitioner, Santosh Subhash Koli, through his mother Sunandabai Subhash Koli, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority failed to verify in-camera statements and did not consider that the alleged incident was a public agitation.

The petitioner, Avinash @ Balu Atmaram More, challenged his detention order dated 07-06-2022 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Convicts' Appeals on Premature Release Under Goa Prisons Rules, 2006 Due to Parole Period Exclusion. Period of Parole Counted as Remission Under Rule 335 and Excluded from Actual Imprisonment for Calculating 14-Year Requirement for Premature Release.

The dispute arose from convicts undergoing life imprisonment who applied for premature release under the Goa Prisons Rules, 2006, claiming they had co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in National Security Act Detention Case Due to Procedural Irregularities. Detention Order Set Aside Following Precedent Where Delay in Considering Representation and Failure to Communicate Rejection Vitiated Order Under Section 8(1) of National Security Act, 1980.

The appeal originated from a judgment dated 24 August 2021 of the Division Bench at the Indore Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, which reject...