Search Results for "Insolvency Code"

530 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 530 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Caveat in Execution Proceedings — Caveat Under Section 148A CPC Not Maintainable After Execution Application Is Filed. Court Holds That Assignee Decree-Holder Can Execute Decree Without Notice to Judgment-Debtor Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioners, who are judgment-debtors in a pending execution application, filed a caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Depositor's Appeal in MPID Act Case, Directs Release of Attached Property on Bank Guarantee. Court holds that Section 4 of MPID Act does not require deposit of entire amount claimed by depositor for release of property.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No. 451 of 2020 filed by Rabibai Mohamad Ismail (appellant) and Criminal Appeal No. 88 of 2021 filed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Damages Suit Under Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Impliedly Barred. Section 7(4) of the Act Recognizes Concurrent Civil Remedy, Hence Suit for Damages Maintainable.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court which set aside a decree for damages in favor of the appellant, M. Har...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Bring Legal Heirs on Record After 24-Year Delay in Specific Performance Suit. Condonation of Delay Refused as Plaintiff's Mistaken Belief Does Not Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by the plaintiff (Sunil Gupta) in a suit filed in 1989 for specific performance of an agreement dated 15...