Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

483 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 483 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Scientific Officer for Unauthorised Absence and Misconduct — Petitioner Failed to Justify Absence Despite Repeated Opportunities. The court held that the termination was proportionate and that the principles of natural justice were complied with.

The petitioner, Mr. Sahivanagouda H. Patil, was a Scientific Officer at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) who had developed high-yielding groundnut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Reduction of Punishment from Removal to Reversion in Disciplinary Matter. Petitioner's challenge to rejection of representation for reduction of punishment fails as court finds no grounds to interfere with the decision of the disciplinary authority.

The petitioner, Suresh Gangadhar Dharasurkar, a retired government servant, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gunwant Dhumbhare, a public servant, for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yuvraj Chintaman Selokar, was a senior clerk in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aheri. He was convicted by the Special Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Railway Employee for Overcharging Decoy Passenger in Disciplinary Proceedings. Central Administrative Tribunal's Order of Reinstatement Set Aside as Disciplinary Authority's Discretion Not Vitiated by Non-Supply of Enquiry Report.

The case involves a disciplinary action against a railway employee, Moni Shankar, who was a Booking Supervisor. He was appointed as a Trains Clerk in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Sangli in Special Case No.1 of 1987, which acquitted the respondent-accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Order for Payment of Subsistence Allowance to Suspended Railway Employee. Employer's Failure to Pay Subsistence Allowance During Suspension Period Renders Subsequent Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid.

The Union of India, through the Chief Workshop Manager of Central Railway, Parel, Mumbai, filed two writ petitions challenging orders of the Central G...