Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

2673 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2673 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

15 Feb 2013

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Favour of Claimant. Court Holds That Single Judge Erred in Reappreciating Evidence and Interfering with Arbitrator's Findings on Quantum and Interest.

30 Aug 2023

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Paramount Limited (appellant) against the judgmen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Petition in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute Over Incorporation of Arbitration Clause. Court Holds That Amenities Agreement's Arbitration Clause Was Incorporated Into Leave and Licence Agreement Under Section 7(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Based on Contract Terms Making It an Integral Part.

13 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from agreements between a banking company incorporated under South Korean laws (petitioner) and the respondent concerning offic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Media Agency Contract Dispute. Rejects Limitation Objection as Not Ex-Facie Time-Barred, Holding That Limitation Is a Mixed Question of Fact and Law to Be Decided by the Arbitrator.

9 Jan 2023

The applicant, TLG India Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Appointment Despite Limitation Bar — Scope of Section 11(6A) Confined to Existence of Arbitration Agreement. The 2015 Amendment Act restricts court's role to checking arbitration agreement existence, leaving limitation and other issues to arbitrator under Section 16.

27 Nov 2019

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 21.12.2010 between M/s. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited (Petitioner-Contractor) and Northern Co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition in Arbitration Matter Upholding High Court's Quashing of Arbitral Award. Court Found No Valid Arbitration Agreement Between Parties and That State Government Lacked Jurisdiction to Appoint Arbitrator Under Section 143-A(3) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965 for Octroi Collection Contract Dispute.

24 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from an octroi collection contract awarded by Ambernath Municipal Council to Petitioners. through a tender process in March 199...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

19 Nov 2025

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Challenging the Majority Arbitral Award's Decision on Quantum of Construction Costs. Petitioner, Claimant in Development Dispute, Asserts That Majority Award Erred in Awarding Cost at Rs.775 per sq.ft. Instead of Actual Cost of Rs.7.26 Crores and Failed to Grant Interest and Costs.

3 Jun 2019

The matter originated from a development agreement dated 29 October 1993 between the petitioner, Caprihans India Limited, and the respondent, Hindoost...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Section 9 Arbitration Application Due to Lack of Party Identity with Arbitration Agreement. Joint Venture Agreement's Arbitration Clause Does Not Bind Non-Signatory Respondents as They Are Not Parties to the Agreement.

22 Sep 2014

The appeal was filed against the judgment and order dated 2 July 2014 of the learned Single Judge in Arbitration Petition No.66 of 2014, which dismiss...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute — Clause 27.4 Held Valid Arbitration Agreement, Third Party Not Bound. The court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the petitioner and respondents 1 to 4 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but dismissed the petition against respondent No.5 who was not a party to the agreement.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Nitesh Urban Development Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

43 44 45 46 47

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)