Search Results for "section 24(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 24(2)"

512 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 512 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Impleadment of Proprietor's Wife in Money Suit Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC. Plaintiff's Objection That No Cause of Action Was Pleaded Against Proposed Party Does Not Bar Impleadment When Presence Is Necessary for Effective Adjudication.

6 Jan 2026

The revision petitioner, K. Balasathiya Narayanan, filed a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orde...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Impleadment of Proprietor's Wife in Money Suit. Order I Rule 10(2) CPC Allows Impleadment of Necessary Party for Effective Adjudication of Dispute Arising from Dishonoured Cheque Issued for Business Loan.

6 Jan 2026

The revision petitioner, K. Balasathiya Narayanan, filed a civil suit (O.S. No.176 of 2019) before the Principal District Court, Erode, against the fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Bogus Purchases Case — Disallowance of 10% Purchases Set Aside. ITAT's finding that AO's order was not based on cogent evidence required full deletion of addition, not partial disallowance.

15 Oct 2024

The case involves three Income Tax Appeals filed by the Assessee, Ashok Kumar Rungta, challenging the ITAT's order dated August 9, 2017, which upheld ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Lapse as Compensation Was Deposited and Possession Was Taken Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Requires Both Non-Payment and Non-Possession.

20 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition initiated in 1964 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with an award declared in 1967. The Delhi Developmen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as Possession Was Taken, Satisfying One of the Twin Conditions for Non-Lapse.

20 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning specific land. The Government of NCT of...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Government Order Cancelling Mining Leases for Non-Existent Quarrying Leases — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Application of Mind. The impugned order cancelled quarrying leases under Section 4(1A) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rule 8(1) of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994, but petitioners held only mining leases, not quarrying leases.

24 May 2021

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Ganapathy Granite Impex Pvt Ltd. and Sri Janardhan Naik challenging an order dated 20.06.2018 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition in IOD Requiring Registered Agreement with Tenant for Redevelopment. Condition No.10 in IOD directing that registered agreement with existing tenant not be submitted before CC is set aside as arbitrary and contrary to DCR.

5 Jun 2018

The Petitioner, MIG (Bandra) Realtors and Builders Pvt. Ltd., a developer, acquired redevelopment rights over land admeasuring approximately 20149.40 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Declares Prescriptive Title Over Survey No.85/1. Court holds that continuous possession for over 12 years confers ownership by adverse possession under the Limitation Act, 1963.

31 Mar 2005

The dispute in this second appeal concerns a property admeasuring about 6225 square meters, surveyed under No.85/1, located in Poinguinim village, Can...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Plaintiff's Prescriptive Title in Property Dispute — Continuous Possession for Over 30 Years Establishes Ownership Under Limitation Act, 1963. Adverse Possession Claim Succeeds as Defendants Fail to Prove Their Ownership or Possession of Survey No.85/1.

31 Mar 2005

The dispute concerns a property admeasuring about 6225 sq. metres, surveyed under No.85/1 as 'Shristhal' in Poinguinim village, Canacona Taluka, Goa. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Court Officers Seeking Parity in Pension and Retirement Benefits with Higher Judicial Officers. Classification of employees into Class I and Class II based on duties and responsibilities is valid and not discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, fifteen officers of the High Court of Bombay holding positions such as Registrar, Prothonotary, Commissioner for Taking Accounts, Add...

42 43 44 45 46

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)