Search Results for "search and seizure before FIR"

594 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 594 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Murder Conviction in Loni Axe Killing. Live-in Partner's Murder Proved Through Partly Hostile Eyewitness, Blood Evidence, and Call Records Under Section 302 IPC.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Maya, his live-in partner of five y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act. Failure to Record Information and Conduct Personal Search in Presence of Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Sri Subramanyam, was convicted by the XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS), Bangalore, in Spl.C.C.N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) Mandatory Requirement. Secret Information Not Reduced to Writing and Sent to Superior Officer, Vitiated Trial.

The appellant, Bhola Vijayprasad Gupta, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, on 27.01.2006 in Sessions Trial 4/2003 for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Police Notice Under Section 41(1)(a) Cr.P.C. for Lack of Reasonable Suspicion — Journalist's Right to Liberty Protected. The court held that a notice to appear before police must be based on recorded reasons and cannot be issued arbitrarily.

The petitioner, a senior journalist, challenged a notice dated 06-06-2024 issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Amruthalli Police Station, under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Trade Mark Infringement Case Due to Lack of Registered Proprietor Status. Police lacked authority to investigate under repealed Trade & Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 as complainant failed to establish registered trade mark ownership.

The petitioner, Surendra Yeshwant Karnik, sole proprietor of M/s. Karnik & Associates, filed a criminal writ petition challenging FIR No. 2 of 2004 re...